Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1193

reference
671-tree-1
name
1193
tree-preservation-order

undefined

671-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.017533 50.881342)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.017490 50.881337,-1.017492 50.881346,-1.017498 50.881353,-1.017507 50.881359,-1.017519 50.881363,-1.017532 50.881365,-1.017557 50.881360,-1.017567 50.881354,-1.017573 50.881346,-1.017575 50.881338,-1.017573 50.881330,-1.017567 50.881322,-1.017558 50.881316,-1.017546 50.881312,-1.017533 50.881311,-1.017520 50.881312,-1.017508 50.881316,-1.017498 50.881322,-1.017492 50.881329,-1.017490 50.881337)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL